中國專業(yè)當(dāng)代藝術(shù)資訊平臺(tái)
搜索

自說自畫——當(dāng)代實(shí)驗(yàn)藝術(shù)展

開幕時(shí)間:2016-11-16 16:00:00

開展時(shí)間:2016-11-16

結(jié)束時(shí)間:2017-01-06

展覽地址:煉金術(shù)藝術(shù)空間(陜西省西安市咸寧西路云錦興慶苑一樓)

策展人:楊青青,李洋

參展藝術(shù)家:李山,張永和,楊青青,徐國鋒,康愷,王韋予,石翔宇,劉波倫,龔新如,白夜,田櫟,王文聃,張?jiān)?楊洋,王健,呂亮,查大維

主辦單位:上海升洋文化發(fā)展有限公司,煉金術(shù)藝術(shù)空間·西安

展覽介紹


  王爾徳說:我喜歡自言自語,因?yàn)檫@樣節(jié)約時(shí)間,而且不會(huì)有人與我爭論。
  上世紀(jì)五十年代是達(dá)芬奇,六十年代是金斯伯格,七十年代是馬塞杜尚,八十年代是史蒂芬霍金。作為偶像,他們都有著神奇之處。史蒂芬霍金在制作數(shù)學(xué)模型時(shí)的細(xì)密思考和仰望夜空時(shí)對(duì)宇宙的隨機(jī)閱讀,都應(yīng)該是藝術(shù)家所具備的基本素質(zhì)。他拖著病殘的身體上床的那一刻,想到“黑洞不黑”的情景,令人辛楚而又興奮。九十年代進(jìn)入偶像平民化的時(shí)代,藝術(shù)家們隨著文化歷史的推進(jìn),自覺或不自覺地行走在思想意識(shí)的最前沿。他們既是群體潮流的引領(lǐng)者,也是個(gè)體意識(shí)的吟唱者。
  文化藝術(shù)大語境變幻之下的藝術(shù)家自我表述,更加具有自發(fā)性,自立性,和自省性。處于藝術(shù)市場里的游離狀態(tài),并不表示作品對(duì)文化氛圍的不介入,反而,這是一次更加純粹的藝術(shù)家與藝術(shù)家之間的對(duì)話,藝術(shù)家與作品之間的對(duì)話,以及作品之間的對(duì)話。同一個(gè)空間里,藝術(shù)家們自說自畫著,透析他們作品背后的形態(tài),似乎有“生命”在蠕動(dòng)。我們是否因?yàn)橛^看得太多而沒有時(shí)間欣賞,描述得太多而沒有時(shí)間思考?自說自畫,是表述的一種狀態(tài);自說自畫,是表述的一種態(tài)度;自說自畫,是表述的一種反常態(tài)。藝術(shù)家發(fā)自內(nèi)心的原聲表述,是獨(dú)白,是吶喊,是叫囂……!歷史終會(huì)將所有的最初的對(duì)立化解掉,待到那時(shí),必將是一種妥協(xié)和寬容,必將是與創(chuàng)作者和觀賞者的共榮。
  本次展覽的參展作品,創(chuàng)作形式多樣,創(chuàng)作語匯豐富,從視與聽的多種角度表現(xiàn)藝術(shù)家對(duì)存在狀態(tài)的解讀,對(duì)現(xiàn)世的認(rèn)知。而觀眾在視聽沖擊之下,除了會(huì)被各種經(jīng)驗(yàn)因素干擾,也會(huì)被一知半解的導(dǎo)讀而誤導(dǎo)。只有直面藝術(shù)作品,充分感受心靈層面的交流,才能獲得最原本的體驗(yàn)。觀者與作品的對(duì)話,已經(jīng)超越了藝術(shù)創(chuàng)作的掌控范圍,既然無法規(guī)范,何不讓藝術(shù)家放手而作,而我們一起與之“自說自畫”?!
  ——楊青青李洋
  “自說自畫展”集結(jié)了上海及西安本地的十幾位藝術(shù)家的作品,其來自不同藝術(shù)家各自的新作或近期能夠表示藝術(shù)家某種定型風(fēng)格的作品,也許這就是策展人對(duì)這個(gè)展覽如此命名的原因。我本來對(duì)展覽名稱中出現(xiàn)“實(shí)驗(yàn)”二字?jǐn)M商榷,因現(xiàn)當(dāng)代藝術(shù)在中國已經(jīng)有三十年的歷史了,目前在國際藝術(shù)界也似乎頻見中國當(dāng)代藝術(shù)亮相并具備了一定影響力。當(dāng)代藝術(shù)在中國已經(jīng)成為一種成熟的近乎經(jīng)典的藝術(shù)樣式,所謂實(shí)驗(yàn)性已式微。另一方面,從世界的角度來看,當(dāng)代藝術(shù)幾乎已經(jīng)沒有任何藩籬,它可以是任何東西或任何事物,每天無數(shù)個(gè)藝術(shù)家、策展人、畫廊主、評(píng)論家都在翹盼新的藝術(shù)物種誕生,猶如時(shí)尚界的一場流行秀的開幕一般。當(dāng)代藝術(shù)已經(jīng)不具有實(shí)驗(yàn)的空間了。但是對(duì)于西安來說,我們恐怕還要演個(gè)前傳,盡管在信息上我們離當(dāng)代藝術(shù)并不遙遠(yuǎn),可在現(xiàn)實(shí)發(fā)生的事實(shí)下,當(dāng)代藝術(shù)的演進(jìn)仍然是新銳并實(shí)驗(yàn)著的(尤其對(duì)一些個(gè)人而言)。
  “自說自畫”雖然不是個(gè)主題鮮明的展覽,它只是藝術(shù)家散件的集合,但是作品所呈現(xiàn)的氣象卻頗具當(dāng)代性。這一點(diǎn)我們回顧一下現(xiàn)代藝術(shù)的“泛敘事”到現(xiàn)代主義之后的“社會(huì)敘事”,就可廓清它的樣貌——我稱其為“個(gè)人敘事”,從這點(diǎn)上來說“自說自畫”到恰如其分。但是這里也有一個(gè)殘酷的“文化叢林”法則,個(gè)人的破碎甚至于流水賬的故事并不總能打動(dòng)人,或撥動(dòng)文化的敏感處。大多都流于老人般的令人瞌睡的往事嘮叨,淪為一個(gè)人的喃喃獨(dú)語。或許我們每個(gè)人都希望能將自己的故事寫入部族的史詩,讓一代代人傳頌下去,但是每個(gè)人也要做好準(zhǔn)備,你的作品只是對(duì)你自己的紀(jì)念,一種冠于藝術(shù)之名刷下存在感而已。而且時(shí)刻警醒著,被社會(huì)拉黑。那么或許還有一條路,藝術(shù)成為個(gè)人的自我治療(不禁讓我想起我家國王舔他的傷口),這樣就有一條頗為文藝的路徑,從卡繆(AlbertCamus)到科爾維諾(ItaloCalvino)再到博爾赫斯(JorgeLuisBorges),但他們只是自己乖離這個(gè)社會(huì),并總是矯情地發(fā)些牢騷罷了。他們還真是放不下。這條路還有一個(gè)幽深的小徑,密林陰暗深邃,那就是自然而然的、不為人知的吟唱。但滑稽的是如一則古老的預(yù)言:“如果密林深處有一顆樹倒下了,沒有人在場,這顆倒下的樹會(huì)發(fā)出聲音嗎?”幸運(yùn)的是,這個(gè)森林叫翁布羅薩,樹上有個(gè)叫柯西莫的小子。
 ?。?biāo)題借用科爾維諾小說《樹上的男爵》)
  ——蘇中秋
  關(guān)于空間展示的美作,不必贅述,我若多做巧飾便是剝奪你一見鐘情的權(quán)利。昨天,她們可能還在中國的各個(gè)角落里,還在遙遠(yuǎn)的太平洋彼岸,今天,她們已在這里“各說各畫”。她們都是藝術(shù)家的孩子,懷著真心,來到這世上等待,等那個(gè)懂的人,或許就是你。她們更是上帝的嬰兒,擁抱純凈與美好的信仰,自由穿越于現(xiàn)在和未來。
  每一個(gè)凡夫俗子都有一顆自由的心靈,只要心似大海,懷抱美好與熱情。我相信,只要靈魂自由,就可以漫步世間的任何一個(gè)角落。而那些美永遠(yuǎn)都在,還因了你的來到,我們結(jié)伴游蕩于當(dāng)代藝術(shù)的幻境。初心里,卻是那所謂的情懷作祟。否則,你不會(huì)來。她們也不會(huì)從東到西,自南至北,一路招搖,隨風(fēng)穿行。從彩虹的那一端,落到這一端。。。
  初冬之晨,唇齒不語,心已沸騰。北國初冬的寒風(fēng),或許,已拂過你的面頰。而南國寒冬的雨,卻還在窗外紛紛擾擾徘徊不移。請(qǐng)上天賜一個(gè)期許,來年,讓我們?cè)傧嘤觯≡谏镒蠲赖拇禾?,在蟬鳴不休的仲夏夜,在令人沉醉的金色深秋,哪怕又是一個(gè)大雪紛飛的潔白冬日,只要,那份心情還在。誠然,只愿你就是期許中,那個(gè)懂的人兒!
  美在長安,東風(fēng)西進(jìn)。各說各畫,握手情在。
  ——出品人:晉楊
  Oscar Wilde had one of his characters announce "I liketo do all the talking myself. It saves time, and prevents arguments"thereby rendering attention to one's own importance of the self, albeit withhis unique brand of cutting cynicism. This  sharp focus on the role of theself has gone through various iterations over the decades since Wilde.
  In the50s of last century there was Da Vinci, the 60s saw Ginsberg, 70s had Duchamp,and in the 80s Stephen Hawking. All special figures in their respective fields,and each enlivening audiences with their unique appeal. WithStephen Hawking we had the production of mathematical models of fine thinkingthat helped underpin our knowledge of what we see as we gaze up at the nightsky. His influence in our understanding of the universe has fed a moreenlightened curiosity and spurred more exploration, both being fundamental qualitiesfor artists. The moment when he dragged his sick body to the bed, and reveledin the thoughts that the"black hole is not black" produced ascenario, that breeds intense emotions to evoke; excitement, revelation,sympathy. By the1990s we had begun to see the beginning of a new era, one in which social idolsblended with popular culture seamlessly. And with that there was an advancedcultural background consciously, or possibly unconsciously, walking in theforefront of our ideological consciousness.
  The newera has the public act not only as the leader of the group trends, but also asthe impetus for individual consciousness. Under the diverse cultural andartistic contextual atmosphere, artists express themselves more spontaneously,with self-reliance, and introspection. Concurrently we have seen that in thiscontext, being at the edge of the art market does not infer that works arebeyond the cultural atmosphere, but rather that there has been an attempt toforge a purer dialogue between artists, artists and works, and the discoursethat  thrives amid such works. In one same space, behind the art workform, there seems to be a "life" dancing vibrantly to its own rhythm.
  Do wehave too much to describe but no time to think? too much to watch but no timeto appreciate? EXPRESSION versus INTENTION, is a representation of one kind ofstatement, one kind of attitude of representation and abnormal expression. Theheart of the original sound representation is monologue, is shouting, is screaming...... !Time will eventually begin to dissolve all the initial opposition, butuntil then, it reaches a kind of compromise with tolerance. Consequently,creators and viewers reach a common plateau.
  The Artdisplayed at this exhibition reflect the creations that have been formed by avariety of languages, and which as a result are creating a rich vocabulary,from multiple angles of vision and auditory stimulation that were selected byeach of the artists to interpret modern norms. The visual impact for audienceswill be a major experiential factor, but it is an experience that risks beingdistorted by inconsequential reading. Far better to face these pieces directly,and embrace the full experience of the encounter, with the transcendence oftypical, static communication. In this way, through observation, we obtain themost authentic and original perception. This is a form of dialogue that occursbetween viewer and the work, and it goes well beyond the scope of control thatcan be set by anyone one observer. Since we can not regulate it, just let go ofthe need to curtail or control and in this way, we are curious to see howEXPRESSION versus INTENTION!
                                                      ——Yang Qingqing   CarolynLi
  Speaking Themselves andDrawing Themselves Exhibition gathered the works of more than a dozen artistsfrom Shanghai and Xi’an. These works are new or the artists’ particular style,and it might be the reason of the exhibition name. I was considering about the“Experimental” in exhibition name, for the modern and contemporary art alreadyhas 30 years history. Chinese contemporary art is often seen in internationalart world and has certain influence. Contemporary art has become a kind of artstyle which is mature and close to classic in China. The so-called experimentalhas declined. On the other hand, from the viewpoint of world, contemporary artalmost has no barrier, it can be anything. Numerous artists, curators,galleries and critics are looking for the birth of a new art species, like theopening of fashion show. Contemporary art no longer has the experimental space.But for Xi’an, I’mafraid we have to play a prequel. Although we are not far away fromcontemporary art on information, under the reality of the facts, the evolutionof contemporary art is still new and experimental (especially for someindividuals).
  Speaking Themselves andDrawing Themselves is not a thematic exhibition, only a collection of artists’,but the attitudes of works’ are quite contemporary. Reviewing the “Narrative”modern art and “Social Narrative” after modernism, its appearance is clear—— Icall it “Personal Narrative”. Speaking Themselves and Drawing Themselves isquite appropriate on this point. But there is also acruel “Cultural Jungle” law. Personal broken and meaningless story can notalways impress people or touch the sensitive area of culture. Most of them islike the old man’s nagging or someone’s mumbling to himself. Perhaps each of uswants to write down our own story into the tribe’s epic, and be famed bygenerations. But everyone should be prepared to know, your works are just foryour own memory, just a sense of presence with the name of art. You shouldremain vigilant to be forbidden by society. Then, there might hasanother way, art become personal self treatment (it makes me think the King, mydog, licks its wounds). So there is a quite artistic way, from Albert Camus toItalo Calvino, to Jorge Luis Borges. But it is themselves to different andcomplain the society. They just can not let it go.
  This way has a deeppath, the forest is dark and deep. It is the naturally and secretly sing. As anancient prophecy:”if there is a tree fell in the woods, nobody is there, didthe fallen tree make a sound?”
  Luckily, the forest isOmbrosa , the guy in the trees named Cosimo.
  (the title is inspiredby the Baron in the Trees of Corvino)                                                                                                                    ——Zhongqiu Su

部分參展藝術(shù)家主頁


作品預(yù)展